|
|
|
Working Group for a United Nations Emergency
Peace Service
Global Action to Prevent War (Global Action)
continues to work on the prospects of adding another tool
to the prevention toolbox: a rapid reaction United Nations
service, alternatively termed a UN Emergency Peace Service
(UN EPS).
Despite the need for the UN to move promptly to prevent genocide,
"ethnic cleansing," and other crimes against humanity, or
to take emergency actions following natural disasters and
environmental accidents, the UN has no reliable capacity to
move quickly, even if halting a catastrophe could save hundreds
of thousands of lives. Genocide in Rwanda illustrates this
incapacity, as do the killings of innocent people in Cambodia,
the former Yugoslavia, East Timor, Sierra Leone, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo, Liberia, the Sudan, and elsewhere.
The time has come to create a permanent UN Emergency Peace
Service to ensure that the next preventable humanitarian disaster
will not occur. If such a service had been established earlier,
it probably could have prevented many of the atrocities that
have killed millions of civilians, wounded millions more,
forced tens of millions from their homes, destroyed entire
economies, and wasted hundreds of billions of dollars. Of
course, such a service would not be a panacea for security
problems in general; indeed, it would be designed to complement
-- not replace -- other essential national, regional, and
United Nations efforts. Yet an emergency service could provide
immediate, full protection in some crises and serve as an
advance peace service that would also prepare the way for
subsequent additional help, if needed, in larger conflicts
-- a vital function that is not provided by any existing agency.
Because governments have not created the necessary UN capability,
the responsibility for breathing life into the United Nations
Emergency Peace Service now lies with civil society, working
with allies in the UN and interested governments. Global Action
is working with key partners in a Working Group for the establishment
of such a service. We are researching the possibilities and
challenges of such a service, and creating a plan for moving
forward. Interested parties please contact coordinator@ globalactionpw.org
Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict
(GPPAC)
Global Action has joined the GPPAC, a network organization
working on drawing out the roles of civil society in preventing
armed conflict, and the connections between conflict prevention
civil society organizations and the United Nations. GPPAC
was established when the European Center for Conflict Prevention
(ECCP) answered the call of the Secretary General in Recommendation
27 in his Report on the Prevention of Armed Conflict (2001).
He asked NGOs “with an interest in conflict prevention to
organize a conference of local, national, and international
NGOs to determine the role of civil society in prevention
and its relation with the work of the UN”.
The ECCP is now acting as the Secretariat for this work,
and has identified 15 regions around the world, each with
a regional initiator. The regions are each developing their
own process for identifying recommendations to bring to the
2005 conference, and most have already held Regional Conferences
and adopted regional recommendations. At the conference, NGOs,
in discussion with supportive Member States and UN officials,
will work out global recommendations on the role of civil
society in conflict prevention, and an action plan to begin
to implement those recommendations. All these will then be
submitted to the UN. Working with the UN has the advantages
of making sure they know what is happening at the local level,
magnifying the audience and the potential for assistance on
individual projects, and increasing the potential to influence
the decisions that affect our lives.
The UN office of Global Action is working with the UN-NGO
Conflict Prevention Working Group on logistics for a conference
at the UN in 2005.
Security Council Resolution 1325
SC Resolution 1325 on Women Peace and Security, a collaborative
effort of NGOs introduced in the Security Council by Namibia,
is approaching its fourth anniversary this October 31, 2004.
This resolution, the first to mention women and security,
says that women have a particular and crucial role to play
in security, and that they must be involved in all aspects
and stages of it. Importantly, it means that women must be
at the negotiating table in conflict situations. The full
implementation of Resolution 1325 is point number 9 of the
Global Action Program and is one of our first five-year priorities.
The Working Group decided that Global Action could be most
useful by: 1) Asking missions how their governments are implementing
1325 2) Assisting in disseminating material on 1325, including
a survey for NGOs around the world that asks how 1325 is being
implemented in their locale, and 3) Including 1325 in our
advocacy work More information is available at: www.peacewomen.org
and www.womenwarpeace.org
US National Steering Committee
The US National Steering Committee is developing a large public
education campaign about war, peace, and international law
and cooperation. This campaign will be aimed at two segments
of the US population: young people who face possible military
service, and older allies. The appeal to the young folks will
be aimed at their feelings about serving in the military.
It will work to bridge the gap between the self-oriented resistance
the draft and an understanding that many other people their
age are being forced to fight wars. The appeal to older allies
will work to bridge the gap between resistance to the war
and working for peace, by introducing practical plans for
peace, like the Global Action Program Statement.
|
|
|