Court Cases: German Prosecutor dismisses
case against US commanders over Abu Ghraib
|
Peter Weiss,
IALANA Vice-President |
On February 10, 2005, the German Federal Prosecutor dismissed
a complaint filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR)
and four Iraqis against high ranking United States civilian
and military commanders over abuses committed at Abu Ghraib
prison and elsewhere in Iraq.
The initial complaint, submitted by CCR Vice-President Peter
Weiss (also IALANA Vice-President) and CCR President Michael
Ratner, named Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, former
Central Intelligence Agency chief George Tenet and eight other
officials as defendants. Recently-confirmed US Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales was added to the complaint on January 31.
CCR argued that German courts had jurisdiction to consider
such a complaint because German law allows war criminals to
be investigated regardless of their citizenship or country
of residence. The German Code of Crimes against International
Law grants German Courts universal jurisdiction for the above-described
crimes in Article 1, Part 1, Section 1 which states: "This
Act shall apply to all criminal offenses against international
law designated under this Act, even when the offence was committed
abroad and bears no relation to Germany.”
This means that those who commit such crimes can be prosecuted
wherever found: they, like pirates of old, are considered
enemies of all humankind. “German law in this area is leading
the world," Peter Weiss was quoted in Frankfurter Rundschau
on November 29. Michael Ratner notes that “the existence
of ‘torture memos’ drafted by administration officials and
the authorization of techniques that violated humanitarian
law by Secretary Rumsfeld, Lt. General Sanchez and others
make clear that responsibility for Abu Ghraib and other violations
of law reaches all the way to the top.”
The German Prosecutor did not deny the possibility of jurisdiction
for such crimes, but dismissed the case on the basis that
such crimes should be dealt with in the countries in which
the crimes are committed or of which the alleged perpetrators
are nationals, and only taken up by German courts if there
is a clear failure of such legal systems to act. In this case
the Prosecutor determined that it is up to the United States
to pursue initial legal action against the alleged perpetrators
of torture and their superiors and that German prosecutors
would intervene only if U.S. authorities failed to act.
However, CCR contended that there was no intention by the
US to try these crimes. Peter Weiss said “It is clear that
the U.S. government is not willing to open an investigation
into these allegations against these officials. We view Germany
as a court of last resort. We file these cases here because
there is simply no other place to go.” Weiss pointed out
that Congress has failed to seriously investigate the abuses
and none of the various commissions appointed by the military
and the Bush administration has been willing to look unflinchingly
up the chain of command to consider what criminal responsibility
lies with the military and political leadership. Instead,
they asserted that the abuses and torture were the exclusive
responsibility of rogue lower-level military personnel.
CCR criticised the dismissal as purely political and designed
to evade justice. “The prosecutor did not even discuss
the materials, obvious to all, that demonstrate that the Bush
administration is unwilling to prosecute anyone up the chain
of command.”
Peter Weiss noted “The Prosecutor's statement that there
is no reason to believe that Rumsfeld will not be prosecuted
in the United States reaches a new height in the annals of
incredibility."
CCR suspects that the quick dismissal of the case was a result
of intense political pressure placed on the German legal system
by the United States. When questioned about the case at a
Pentagon press conference earlier this month, Rumsfeld said
that he might refuse to attend the annual security conference
in Munich because of CCR's lawsuit. He stated ominously, "whether
I end up there, we'll soon know.”
CCR submitted hundreds of pages of new documents to the suit
on Feb 7 when they added newlyconfirmed Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales to the complaint. CCR said the prosecutor could not
have even read these materials, which shows how anxious they
are to please the Bush Administrationdismiss first, read later.
However, CCR believes that this is only a temporary setback
to the case. Michael Ratner said "We will absolutely contest
this decision by launching an appeal. It is a temporary setback.
We will pursue Rumsfeld and others. They should be worried;
if not today, tomorrow. Just look at what happened to Pinochet."
For more information, and to add your voice to the 11,000
others who have already sent a message to the German Prosecutor,
see www.ccr-ny.org
|